Maintenance strategy

Preventive vs predictive maintenance: how to choose for each asset

The question is not which maintenance strategy is best. It is which strategy is best for each asset. A lift, a pump and a light bulb deserve very different treatment. This article gives you a simple way to decide.

By the Mintema team8 min read
Preventive vs predictive maintenance: how to choose for each asset

Three strategies in plain language

StrategyHow it worksBest for
Run to failureFix it when it breaks.Cheap, non-critical assets with spares on the shelf.
PreventiveService at fixed intervals of time or usage.Assets that wear in a predictable way.
Predictive (condition-based)Watch the condition and act when it starts to change.Critical, expensive assets whose failures give a warning.

Most organisations use all three. The mistake is applying one of them everywhere: servicing everything on a calendar wastes money, and putting sensors on everything wastes even more.

Start with criticality

Ask two questions for every asset type: what happens when it fails, and how likely is it to fail? A failed pump at a main pumping station can cut water to thousands of homes. A failed light in a corridor is an inconvenience. The first deserves attention; the second does not.

Then look at how it fails

  • If failures come with warning signs such as vibration, heat or noise, predictive maintenance works well.
  • If wear depends on time or use, such as filters, belts or oil, preventive maintenance is the right tool.
  • If failure is sudden and random and the consequence is small, run to failure is often the cheapest choice.

A simple decision guide

  1. High consequence, warning signs

    Predictive. Put sensors or regular readings on it and set limits.

  2. High consequence, no warning signs

    Preventive, with redundancy or spares ready.

  3. Low consequence, predictable wear

    Preventive at a sensible interval.

  4. Low consequence, random failure

    Run to failure, with spares on the shelf.

Getting started with predictive maintenance

You do not need a large IoT project to begin. Start with five to ten critical assets, add one or two readings that really show their health, and set simple limits. When a reading crosses a limit, a work order should be raised automatically, so the warning turns into action.

After a few months, compare the failures you prevented with the cost of the sensors and the work. That comparison is your business case for the next step.

Measure and adjust

Review your strategy at least once a year. If an asset keeps failing between services, shorten the interval or move it to condition-based maintenance. If it never needs anything at its service, stretch the interval.

How Mintema helps

In Mintema, preventive plans can run by date, usage or condition. Sensors are installed on the assets they measure, and rules in the Automation Studio turn readings into alerts and work orders. Dashboards show breakdowns, planned work and cost per asset, so you can see which strategy is paying off.

FAQ

Questions, answered

Have a question that is specific to your organisation? A solution engineer will answer it against your own assets, processes and data.

No. It pays off for critical assets that give warning signs. For cheap or non-critical assets, preventive or run-to-failure is usually more economical.

Very few. Start with a handful of critical assets and one or two meaningful readings each.

A WORKING SESSION

See it on
your own assets.

We will set up one of your asset types and show how the ideas in this post work in practice.

Talk to sales